Much has been written about free software, open source software and commercial software. If however the discussion on as to which is the best option seems to be endless.
However in 2010 with the output. Net 4.0 on March 22 brought back another round to access the code open source vs. closed .
But most of all it is not only the technological aspect, what about the form of marketing? .... The reality is that if you are unable to sell your products, they will not be used by the consumer.
My experience in the United States (country 100% commercial and capitalist) the general consumer is not attracted if the software is open or closed, but the benefits you have and the security or guarantee to be Offer.
Many times when the product is free to play with the double-edged sword commercial means, "If it is free is not worth buying"
On the other hand many industries prefer to buy a product with a warranty of 12 months instead of a free product with no guarantees and support charges and without being able to bring this court for damages.
Free software brings the best yet form and work efficiency, communications and teamwork is equivalent to many professionals on a project, "two heads are better than one"
In my opinion not everything that is accessible to say it is okay!, the software have ability to be easily reproduced does not mean it should be accepted, in a discussion with a colleague explained to me that the software should be free and we use formulas created by others and we will reuse without redesign.
But we are not the only profession that takes existing formulas, this means that chemical engineers, civil engineers, accountants, etc, should give their work for free? since they also use formulas in your area that are already existing??
As the computers and technology continue to race towards the future, it hurts me to hear that other professions do not have this dilemma as we have.
Luis G Perez
Chief Technical Officer
Neuralnet